PPC Blog

A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

2 Days Later

posted by PPCblogger in May 7th, 2008
in Google Adwords  

2 days later

It’s been a couple of days since Googles keyword trademarking policy change and it’s interesting to see many advertisers have already been slapped out of the bidding. In a quality score world, its not as simple as bidding against any brand due to quality based minimum bids. Although you might be able to display against any brand you like for a short period, Google will soon kick you into touch if you are deemed not relevant enough.

Patrick over at Blogstorm posted about the effects of the new trademark policy with screenshots of adverts against once trademarked brands such as Tesco, Asda, Lastminute.com and Amazon. But it was just time before many of them simply fell away…

As I mentioned previously in my post regarding preparation of the Google trademark change, quite simply, it will be extremely hard to be able to display against many core branded terms due to low click through rates which will mean you will get slapped with a high minimum CPC.

Lets take a look at those same brand examples today -

Tesco serp

last minute serp

amazon serp

First and foremost, there has been a massive reduction in adverts as expected. Some of the examples may have been rather bad ‘advanced matching’ from Googles broad match feature otherwise the adverts left within the bidding for the above examples are either -

1) Maintaining a high enough click through rate (and therefore quality score) to keep a reasonable level of minimum CPC. For example, notice how Lastminute.com are having more trouble protecting their brand as many competitors can get away with using ‘Last Minute Holidays’ within the advert title which will be helping to maintain their CTR and advert alive.

2) Advertisers within high CPC markets will find the high minimum CPC’s less of a problem than those in low CPC markets. Advertisers in insurance, loans, mortgages etc markets already pay a high cost per click (£5-£30 max CPC’s), so a high minimum CPC of say even £10 might be lower than their usual average CPC anyway. So for example, Tesco has just a couple of loan related advertisers who can pay that price.

For the above reasons, brands like Amazon will probably have less concerns with competitors. Some of the main areas effected are highly competitive markets with high relevance between brands and product offerings where consumers actively comparison shop for the very best deal. Brands within ‘car insurance’ for example have been hit hard.

These guys pay high CPC’s and have a relevance/comparison shopping nature -

confused serp

go compare serp

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

2 Comments

Google Adds OneBox Results For Premiership Football

posted by PPCblogger in May 2nd, 2008
in Google  

I just spotted Google is showing onebox results for queries relating to English football clubs. A simple club search query brings back their next fixture. Screenshot below -

liverpool onebox result

Only seems to be Premiership clubs currently. Cool.

Update - Google have now added last game results alongside the next fixture. As below -

google onebox result for football

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

1 Comment

Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change - Are You Prepared?

posted by PPCblogger in May 2nd, 2008
in Google Adwords  

Ok so the 5th of May lift on Google keyword trademarking date is nearly here.

Are you prepared? Are your clients?

Are you going all out aggressively to bid against competitors trademarks?.

Are you going to start bidding against your own brand as protection?.

Perhaps a mixture?. Or are you going to wait and see what your competitors do?

Looks like Tesco have taken the ‘moral high ground’ issuing a statement that they will not be bidding against anyone elses branded terms.

Will this moral high ground mean that they get less competition against their own brand?.

Lets see.

The key thing to remember here is ROI. You can go and bid wildy against any brand you like if you are willing to pay through the nose for it, but with a lack of relevance and ultimate conversion its expenditure you can do without.

Lets not forget, Google has quality based minimum bids, so although you may think your brand is relevant, if your click through rate is not high enough your minimum bids will get very high. Trademarks are still in place for adtext and this is a massive factor in click through rates.

Against core branded keywords advertisers will find CTR will not be high enough to allow bidding against brand unless you are willing to pay extortionate CPC’s. This is because core branded keywords contain a high number of navigational queries with lazy searchers who would rather search for the brand than type the url directly into the browser. These searchers can be blind to anything other than the brand they searched for.

I recently set up a competitors adgroup for a client with these types of competitor terms. The competition was directly related selling the same product and all keywords were on phrase match. However, as expected CTR was simply not high enough to keep them active. Unless Google lower CTR thresholds you will see this -

quality based minimum bids

The Hitwise blog highlights the gap in brand traffic lost between the US and UK (where the US have always been able to bid openly against keywords), so there is brand volume to be had from competitors. It just needs to be taken from longer tail queries and more inteligently than simply bidding against core terms.

Another key thing to remember is the relative nature of Googles bidding platform.

If you are bidding against your competitors brand as the only advertiser against the brand owner, then your CTR will be poor in comparison. Google takes into account all advertisers against that keyword. So if you bid in a pack with 8 other advertisers who will also have relatively poor click through rates then the quality threshold might be a lowered a little allowing for lower minimum bids.

So will the threshold naturally decline over time?

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

3 Comments

Amnesty International Promoting Viagra Too

posted by PPCblogger in April 21st, 2008
in SEO  

After Yahoos blog was hacked I spotted today that Amnesty seem to have a similar problem.

Monitoring the SERPs for ‘buy viagra‘ (ahem) I noticed an Amnesty blog post appearing in 8th. If you click on the link you get redirected via some onpage script to a pharmacy site…

amnesty serps

The cached text of the page shows the viagra content. If you go direct to the page (rather than visiting via Google) you won’t be redirected either and can view the text.

What’s most alarming is the scale of the problem over at Amnesty.

A quick site lookup shows blog and news articles full of hidden text and links to .edu domains and ‘pharmacy’ sites… not cool.

Coincidentally the listing above Amnesty for ‘buy viagra’ is from Prospect Magazine. You see as a user you get redirected to the homepage but visit as Googlebot and you see a whole different page. A quick lookup shows they have similar issues to Amnesty.

Looks like Matts 2008 predictions are coming true.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

4 Comments

Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK

posted by PPCblogger in April 4th, 2008
in Google Adwords  

Good news for naughty affiliates. Nightmare for real brands.

Google are moving inline with their policies in the US/Canada.

We’re writing to inform you that we’re changing our trademark complaint procedure in the UK and Ireland. This change may affect how we handle the trademark complaint you currently have on file with Google.

If you’ve submitted a complaint letter requesting that we prevent advertisers from using certain trademark terms anywhere in their ad text, we will continue our efforts to support your request. However, from May 5, 2008, our trademark complaint investigations will no longer result in Google monitoring or restricting keywords for ads served to users in the UK and Ireland. This will bring our procedure in line with the approach taken in the US and Canada. Complaints received on or after today will be processed under our revised procedure.

You do not need to file your trademark complaint with us again unless you would like to amend it based on the new guidelines. For more detailed information regarding our trademark complaint procedure, we invite you to review our revised complaint procedure, posted online at http://www.google.co.uk/tm_complaint.html.

To learn more about this trademark policy revision, please visit http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=92877&hl=en_US.

Sincerely,

Advertising Legal Support Team

More details on the upcoming policy change here.

The new policy will have a big impact on advertisers brand bidding, providing opportunities to bid against competitors brands while of course making it more difficult to protect your own.

Read more about understanding when to bid on your own brand here.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

3 Comments

Yahoo Promoting Viagra

posted by PPCblogger in March 28th, 2008
in Yahoo  

Quite an amusing spot by Jeremy over at PPC Discussions. Looks like the YSMBlog (”nofollow” for you I don’t want to be linking to bad neighbourhoods) has been hacked (another WP exploit example) and currently has a ‘buy viagra’ link hidden in a noscript tag.

Actually what I found interesting is that it took this long for anyone to realise. Check out Archive.org from back in August ‘07.

Looks like they were promoting a few things ;)

<div><u style=”display: none”><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=cheap-phentermine” title=”Cheap Phentermine
“>Cheap Phentermine
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-viagra-online” title=”Buy Viagra Online
“>Buy Viagra Online
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-norvasc” title=”Buy Norvasc
“>Buy Norvasc
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-renova” title=”Buy Renova
“>Buy Renova
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-levitra” title=”Buy Levitra
“>Buy Levitra
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=valium” title=”Valium
“>Valium
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-zyprexa” title=”Buy Zyprexa
“>Buy Zyprexa
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=fioricet” title=”Fioricet
“>Fioricet
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-alprazolam” title=”Buy Alprazolam
“>Buy Alprazolam
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=adderall” title=”Adderall
“>Adderall
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-paxil” title=”Buy Paxil
“>Buy Paxil
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=lipitor” title=”Lipitor
“>Lipitor
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-zithromax” title=”Buy Zithromax
“>Buy Zithromax</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-viagra-online” title=”Order Viagra Online
“>Order Viagra Online
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=didrex” title=”Didrex
“>Didrex
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-zovirax” title=”Order Zovirax
“>Order Zovirax
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-prozac” title=”Buy Prozac
“>Buy Prozac
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=butalbital” title=”Butalbital
“>Butalbital
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-cipro” title=”Order Cipro
“>Order Cipro
</a></u></div>

(I cut the number of links in half, it made the post massive!). Timely considering SEL article about the display:none feature of CSS.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

1 Comment

Understanding When To Bid On Your Own Brand

posted by PPCblogger in March 10th, 2008
in Pay Per Click (PPC)  

Interesting article over at Conversation Marketing about bidding on your own brand name. The post throws up some good arguments, but like all things in life one rule simple does not fit all. Aswell as reasons to bid on your own brand there are equally very good arguments against bidding on brand and it really depends on the business circumstances as to whether it makes sense for you.

When bidding on brand one thing you should always do is track brand performance separately from your non brand campaigns.

There are some agencies who will encourage you to bid against your brand and then proceed to lump it all into one to make the overall figures of your campaign appear far more successful than they actually are; effectively hiding the poorer performance of non brand campaigns.

Things to consider when bidding against your own brand -

1) Other Advertisers
2) Organic Placement
3) Brand Volume
4) Affiliates

1. Other Advertisers - Are there any other adverts displaying against your brand? If there are other advertisers appearing against your brand then I would advise to bid against your brand no matter where you are placed organically. This increases your exposure or shelf space so to speak. If you have a trademark, submit an application to Google to stop other advertisers appearing against your brand in the UK. For US advertisers this works a little differently, you can’t trademark protect keywords, only the use of your trademark within adtext. So those targetting the US will have to maintain a degree of vigilance in monitoring the SERPS if at the time of checking their were no other advertisers.

2. Organic Placement - Where are you placed organically? You should be in the very top position for your brand unless you have an extremely generic or competitive brand name (or a new site!). If you are not top then you should bid against your brand to avoid losing any visitors. If you are top organically and there are no advertisers bidding against your brand then it makes sense to save your money and not bid against your brand. You should however take into consideration point number 4.

3. Brand Volume - How much volume do you get to your brand?. If your brand volume is quite low then cost will be equally small. However, if you are a large brand, bare in mind that you could get a serious amount of your volume going through the PPC advert obviously at a cost. In theory the larger brands should be able to afford this, but it still might be better spent elsewhere.

4. Affiliates - You should have terms and conditions in place to limit affiliates from bidding against brand anyway, whether that’s paid or organically. Obviously if you don’t have affiliates this will not be a problem, but those that do need to consider affiliates because bidding against your own brand can act as protection, especially in the US where you cannot trademark the use of keywords.

Conclusion

In general if you have no other advertisers displaying adverts against your brand name and you are placed at the top organically, then you should not bid against brand. There is no need to pay extra when the difference in clicks from a top organic placement against aggregate clicks via an organic top placement with a PPC advert are generally fairly small. I have seen the research which shows increases, but I have also seen many instances where you are simply paying a cost with no extra benefit.

Although average CPC’s on branded keywords in these circumstances are also very small, if you are a large brand then actually this can equate to a significant amount of volume. Some brands can incurr costs into the thousands each month as an example.

Would this spend not be better funelled back into the paid or organic search campaign?. That said, you will need to monitor your brand within the SERPS, in terms of other advertisers and affiliates especially if you do not have a trademark or are based in the US.

A Happy Medium

There are mediums to be had when bidding on brand. If you are concerned that you are losing out on some misspellings of brand or long tail brand related queries then you can use embedded match to show for the queries you want to.

This allows you to bid broad on your core brand keyword(s) and negatively match out exact (or phrase) match keywords where you are sure you rank organically in top positions. So you can run search query reports (and use log data) to negatively match out further queries you identify where you rank in the top position and believe you would be incurring cost for no reason. Alternatively you could just bid using exact match where you believe you need to show your ad. The Adwords example from the help centre explains embedded match -

“Example: An advertiser selling Toy Story merchandise might use the embedded match option of a negative and exact match on -[Toy Story]. This way, the advertiser’s ads appear for Toy Story dolls and Toy Story products, but not for the exact match Toy Story.”

Still Not Sure?

Like I said at the start, one rule does not fit all. The best thing to do is test and see what works best for you.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

1 Comment

Google Site Links Update

posted by PPCblogger in March 8th, 2008
in Google  

Looks like there has been a site links update, thanks big G. ;)

ppcblog sitelinks

Interesting to see which pages Google chose. The Amy Alexandra post was just a little testing I did for fun and was certainly not one of my most linked to pages, but traffic wise its been pretty big…

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

No Comment

Page Load Time? What’s The Point?

posted by PPCblogger in March 7th, 2008
in Pay Per Click (PPC)  

Am I being to cynical but page load time as another factor in quality score?. Why?
According to Google it’s all in the name of ‘user experience’ and hence it’s going to be added into the quality score algo in Adwords sometime soon.

I don’t get it. Why bother?

Surely if site load time is long and delayed meaning the user experience for a visitor is that awful then they will simply go elsewhere, meaning the advertiser will lose out on conversion. Ultimately if it was that much of a problem it would be detrimental to the advertisers business and they would naturally drop out of the bidding or just fix their problem.

So what’s the point? Isn’t this basically just organic and self fixing anyway?

Do we really need a load time algo to dictate how fast a site should be…it raises more questions and worries about what happens if the site has a small or temporary issue etc. Apparently Google will be clarifying the new factor but still…

If user experience was really the key then develop a system where campaigns automatically pause when there is a certain server or site response over a given time instead of just making advertisers pay extra. Or something.

pulling hair out

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

3 Comments

Removing Sitewide Blogroll / Links In Wordpress

posted by PPCblogger in February 26th, 2008
in SEO  

I have finally found some time to make some changes to the blog. So lets get rid of those sitewide blogroll / links that seem to come with a lot of the ‘out of the box’ WP themes available.

Before -

<h3>Links</h3>
<ul class=”list”>
<?php get_links(-1, ‘<li>’, ‘</li>’, ‘ - ‘); ?>
</ul>

After -

< ?php
if ( is_home() )
{
?>
<h3>Links</h3>
<ul class=”list”>
<?php
get_links(-1,’<li>’, ‘</li>’, ‘ - ‘);
?>
</ul>
<?php
}
?>

Job done.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Permalink

No Comment

« Older Entries

Subscribe to the PPC Blog RSS

get the latest news on all things pay per click


Or Subscribe via Email:  

Sponsors


Yahoo Search Marketing Submit to BOTW

Search

Recent Entries

  • 2 Days Later
  • Google Adds OneBox Results For Premiership Football
  • Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change - Are You Prepared?
  • Amnesty International Promoting Viagra Too
  • Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK
  • Yahoo Promoting Viagra
  • Understanding When To Bid On Your Own Brand
  • Google Site Links Update
  • Page Load Time? What’s The Point?
  • Removing Sitewide Blogroll / Links In Wordpress

Most Commented

  • Flaunting Affiliate Network Rules With Blackhat PPC (23)
  • 13 Myths of Pay Per Click (21)
  • What Next For Bid Management Solutions? (20)
  • Have We Another Pasternack? (9)
  • Yahoo Testing New Quality Based Ranking Algo In UK (9)
  • Hey MSN / Live Search, You Suck (8)
  • Google Tests Adwords Campaign Optimizer Tool (7)
  • Optimising For Accidental Clicks (7)
  • Google Turn Up The Revenue Dial - Adwords Top Ad Placement Formula Change (7)
  • Dave Pasternack SEO Contest Announced (6)

Categories

  • Pay Per Click (PPC)
  • Affiliate PPC
  • Google
  • Search Engine Marketing
  • Yahoo
  • MSN
  • SEO
  • Microsoft Adcenter
  • Google Adwords
  • Microsoft Live
  • Google Adsense
  • Matt Cutts
  • Yahoo Panama
  • Ask
  • Landing Page Quality
  • Google Quality Score
  • Google Adsbot
  • MiVa
  • Yahoo SSP
  • Pay Per Action

Meta

  • Site Admin
  • Logout
  • WordPress
    Yahoo Search Marketing

Recent Comments

  • PPCblogger » 2 Days Later
  • Tom » 2 Days Later
  • Paul » Yahoo Promoting Viagra
  • PPC Blog » 2 Days Later » Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK
  • PPC Blog » 2 Days Later » Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change - Are You P…
  • Tom » Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change - Are You P…
  • JimB » Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change - Are You P…
  • thegaffer » Google Adds OneBox Results For Premiership Footbal…
  • PPC Blog » Google Keyword Tra… » Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK
  • Graham Dolt » Google Adwords Display URL Policy Changes

Monthly Archives

  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007

Links

  • adCenter Blog - Microsoft Adcenter Blog
  • adCenter Labs Tools - Microsoft Adcenter Labs
  • Adwords Blog - Big G’s Adwords Blog
  • Adwords Editor - Google Adwords Editor
  • DaveN - David Naylor Blog
  • Google Keyword Tool - Search Term Tool
  • Google Traffic Estimator - Traffic Tool
  • Google Trends - Google Trends
  • Graywolf - Graywolf SEO Blog
  • Jensene - Contextual Advertising
  • Keyword Discovery - Keyword Discovery Suggestion Tool
  • Marketing Vox - Internet News
  • Matt Cutts - Matt Cutts Blog
  • Search Engine Land - Essential search engine news
  • SEO Blog - SEOptimise Blog
  • SEO Home Blog - Seo Home Blog
  • SeoMoz Page Strength - Page Strength Tool
  • SEroundtable - The fastest SEM news
  • SEW Blog - The old essential blog
  • SEW Forums - The Forums
  • Shoemoney - Skills to pay the bills
  • Sphinn - SEM Discussions
  • Threadwatch - I need to move on, but can’t…
  • Traffick - By Andrew Goodman
  • Web Guerrilla - Seo king Greg Boser
  • Webmaster Radio - As the title says!
  • Wordtracker Keyword Tool - Wordtrackers PPC Keyword Tool
  • Yahoo Keyword Tool - Search Term Tool
  • Yahoo Search Blog - YSearch Blog
©2006-2008 PPC Blog A Cynical look at Pay Per Click
Designed by Elegant WP Themes
Valid XHTML and Valid CSS