<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adwords Introduces Preferred Cost Bidding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-adwords/adwords-introduces-preferred-cost-bidding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-adwords/adwords-introduces-preferred-cost-bidding/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-adwords/adwords-introduces-preferred-cost-bidding/#comment-14961</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-adwords/adwords-introduces-preferred-cost-bidding/#comment-14961</guid>
		<description>On the preferred cost bidding model it seems you can't incorporate position preference. If this is so, it wipes out any benefit you could get becuase of the loss of relevancy in possibly appearing in the lower regions of the results and thus not getting clicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the preferred cost bidding model it seems you can&#8217;t incorporate position preference. If this is so, it wipes out any benefit you could get becuase of the loss of relevancy in possibly appearing in the lower regions of the results and thus not getting clicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
