<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Quality Score Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: StormTrooper</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>StormTrooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>In regards to the different types of QSes... there's two opposing viewpoints:

1) The first holds that only keywords have QSes. Every kw has its own QS and that's it. Most likely that will be the answer if you ask any of the G support drone reps. Are they lying? Ignorant? Or that's actually the truth. I do not know.

2) The second is the "multiple types of QSes" theory that you described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the different types of QSes&#8230; there&#8217;s two opposing viewpoints:</p>
<p>1) The first holds that only keywords have QSes. Every kw has its own QS and that&#8217;s it. Most likely that will be the answer if you ask any of the G support drone reps. Are they lying? Ignorant? Or that&#8217;s actually the truth. I do not know.</p>
<p>2) The second is the &#8220;multiple types of QSes&#8221; theory that you described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
