<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Quality Score Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJBoonen.nl &#187; Verbeter je ROI met behulp van de kwaliteitsscore</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-133760</link>
		<dc:creator>RJBoonen.nl &#187; Verbeter je ROI met behulp van de kwaliteitsscore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-133760</guid>
		<description>[...] Google het altijd heeft over de kwaliteitsscore (enkelvoud), worden er meerdere kwaliteitsscores gehanteerd die op verschillende manieren worden berekend. Google berekent de kwaliteitsscore o.a. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google het altijd heeft over de kwaliteitsscore (enkelvoud), worden er meerdere kwaliteitsscores gehanteerd die op verschillende manieren worden berekend. Google berekent de kwaliteitsscore o.a. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Adwords Quality Score</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-116371</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Adwords Quality Score</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-116371</guid>
		<description>[...] The Google Quality Score Paradox: PPCblog.co.uk&#8217;s perspective on Google&#8217;s Quality Score [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Google Quality Score Paradox: PPCblog.co.uk&#8217;s perspective on Google&#8217;s Quality Score [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Quality Score - The Complete Series (Nov. 2008) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-97309</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Quality Score - The Complete Series (Nov. 2008) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-97309</guid>
		<description>[...] of some very knowledgeable folks) suggests it&#8217;s not that simple. There are a number of different Quality Scores or QS components which are calculated independently and used separately or collectively in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of some very knowledgeable folks) suggests it&#8217;s not that simple. There are a number of different Quality Scores or QS components which are calculated independently and used separately or collectively in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13 Myths of Pay Per Click &#187; PPC Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-93082</link>
		<dc:creator>13 Myths of Pay Per Click &#187; PPC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-93082</guid>
		<description>[...] You will pay 1p a click if there are no other advertisers - Minimum bids &amp; actual CPC are quality based &amp; some engines have set minimum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You will pay 1p a click if there are no other advertisers &#8211; Minimum bids &amp; actual CPC are quality based &amp; some engines have set minimum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TraiaN</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-90415</link>
		<dc:creator>TraiaN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-90415</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good Google provided a little more details on the Quality Score, but even thou QS will remain a big mistery for all of us. Some reverse engineering can be done anyway :). My conclusion is that a highly optimized page in terms of SEO, will have a great quality score. One of my colleagues wrote some articles about Google&#039;s QS. You can find them at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-adwords-quality-score-part-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Adwords Quality Score - Part 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-adwords-quality-score-2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good Google provided a little more details on the Quality Score, but even thou QS will remain a big mistery for all of us. Some reverse engineering can be done anyway :). My conclusion is that a highly optimized page in terms of SEO, will have a great quality score. One of my colleagues wrote some articles about Google&#8217;s QS. You can find them at <a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-adwords-quality-score-part-1" rel="nofollow">Google Adwords Quality Score &#8211; Part 1</a> and <a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-adwords-quality-score-2" rel="nofollow">Part 2</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quality Scores and Quality Score Drivers &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-88487</link>
		<dc:creator>Quality Scores and Quality Score Drivers &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-88487</guid>
		<description>[...] of some very knowledgeable folks) suggests it&#8217;s not that simple. There are a number of different Quality Scores or QS components which are calculated independently and used separately or collectively in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of some very knowledgeable folks) suggests it&#8217;s not that simple. There are a number of different Quality Scores or QS components which are calculated independently and used separately or collectively in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliminate Google CPC High Keyword Cost! &#124; Internet Advertising Deals</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-85395</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliminate Google CPC High Keyword Cost! &#124; Internet Advertising Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-85395</guid>
		<description>[...] Also read on Google Quality Score Paradox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also read on Google Quality Score Paradox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Dion</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-85393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-85393</guid>
		<description>Great article I post articles about google and wanted to track back to you site.  I have copied the link location and added not sure if this is correct.  I normally see people list their tackback. 

Thank you 

Kim Dion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article I post articles about google and wanted to track back to you site.  I have copied the link location and added not sure if this is correct.  I normally see people list their tackback. </p>
<p>Thank you </p>
<p>Kim Dion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Google AdWords Features &#124; The Inside Angle</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-81916</link>
		<dc:creator>New Google AdWords Features &#124; The Inside Angle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-81916</guid>
		<description>[...] Network only ever impacts Quality Score on the Google Network—not on Google&#8221; while other sources maintain what Google has always said - they only take your Google.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Network only ever impacts Quality Score on the Google Network—not on Google&#8221; while other sources maintain what Google has always said &#8211; they only take your Google.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StormTrooper</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>StormTrooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/google-quality-score/the-google-quality-score-paradox/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>In regards to the different types of QSes... there&#039;s two opposing viewpoints:

1) The first holds that only keywords have QSes. Every kw has its own QS and that&#039;s it. Most likely that will be the answer if you ask any of the G support drone reps. Are they lying? Ignorant? Or that&#039;s actually the truth. I do not know.

2) The second is the &quot;multiple types of QSes&quot; theory that you described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the different types of QSes&#8230; there&#8217;s two opposing viewpoints:</p>
<p>1) The first holds that only keywords have QSes. Every kw has its own QS and that&#8217;s it. Most likely that will be the answer if you ask any of the G support drone reps. Are they lying? Ignorant? Or that&#8217;s actually the truth. I do not know.</p>
<p>2) The second is the &#8220;multiple types of QSes&#8221; theory that you described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.ppcblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 03:29:28 -->
