PPC Blog

A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • PPC Management
  • Search Engine Optimisation

Hiding Links In Flash

posted by PPC Blog on July 3rd, 2008
in SEO  

Interesting experiment by the Neutralize Guava guys over on Search Engine War blog where they tested and proved that Google is now indexing links in flash.

Next up for them to prove is whether text in a flash button acts as an anchor on those links… :)

Pretty big achievement by the Google/Adobe engineers, flash still won’t offer the same kind of information html tags will but it is a start.

Anyway, good news if you were of the mind to have a site that needs to hide the odd 10K keyword rich article with some nice juicy links own a flash site.

Anyone thinking free flash intros, movies/widgets?.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

1 Comment

Always Get The Dot Com

posted by PPC Blog on July 2nd, 2008
in Search Engine Marketing  

I always wanted the ppcblog.com domain, but unfortunately it was registered before I got the chance.

At the time, the .net & .org were available aswell as the .co.uk and nobody had built a brand around the name ‘PPC blog‘ in the same way there were seo blogs seemingly everywhere.

About 2+ years ago when I developed this site for a little fun the ppcblog.com domain used to redirect over to payperclickblog.com and the site was aptly named after that domain. This was great as I always wanted to work with the shorter url and ‘brand’.

Aaron Wall of SEO Book is however the owner of the domain which his wife Giovanni and he have decided to develop in the past week, seperate and away from the payperclickblog.com domain.

Aarons SEO Book is a fantastic resource, so I have no doubt this new site will be equally full of great regulary updated content. Regular enough to stay in the Toprank search marketing blog list (ping) which I got kicked from for not updating regulary enough…

As I have never really had a goal for this site other than to share random thoughts, have a nice testing platform for ideas or vent frustration it doesn’t bother me that it shares the same name. But it does highlight the importance of getting all the TLD’s you can if you want to establish yourself globally and block out competition.

Geographical filters are pretty strong, unless you are a high authority domain and in my view you still can’t rely completely on Googles Webmaster Central (and others) to set geotargetting for the sub directory/folder route. Getting all relevant TLD’s for each country in my opinion can still be the safest way to go. Which I might expand upon in another post as I am going off subject.

Anyway, so don’t get confused guys with your .coms and .co.uks – or do and I might get more traffic. ;)

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

3 Comments

123 Reg Hacked

posted by PPC Blog on June 26th, 2008
in SEO  

Another example of a WordPress blog being hacked and injected with hidden links to viagra, tramadol and the like. Their blog is on a subdomain of the main site – http://inside.123-reg.co.uk/

If the self acclaimed ‘UK’s largest web host’ can’t protect their own blog or even spot they have a big problem, what hope is there for the average website owner?. I’m guessing this probably isn’t helping their domain rank.

123 reg serps

Maybe they will give me a free hosting account for letting them know about the problem…

Maybe not, lol

Btw – Patrick at Blogstorm suggested using Google alerts to keep an eye on hacking.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

5 Comments

Why I’m Not A Fan Of Submitting Sitemaps

posted by PPC Blog on June 16th, 2008
in SEO  

This question seems to come up a lot still and while I believe sitemaps in general can be great for helping search engine spiders crawl your site and an effective way of spreading out linkjuice (with some nice anchor text) they can also bite you in the arse when not used intelligently. Certainly submitting XML sitemaps specifically to the search engines in my view can have its drawbacks.

sitemaps

Still Won’t Rank

The key reason for submitting a XML sitemap is to help Google crawl your site and find those deep pages. Now those pages may well be included in the index because of the sitemap submission, but the problem is they are still never going to rank for anything. There is a reason why they were not in the index in the first place and Google will simply not start ranking those pages.

Hide The Truth

In many ways sitemaps hide problems or issues with your website. Personally I would only want pages included within the index from my site that ‘should’ be there naturally. Data you get from using the basic site command in Google is more valuable as you can analyse pages or areas of the site that are having problems being crawled and indexed. This then helps you identify problems with site architecture, internal link structure, content etc and resolve issues properly which will help these pages rank.

Overall Site Quality & Trust

Often pages that are merely included in the index because of a sitemap will or can fall into the ‘supplemental index’ results (its still there) which are low pagerank less trusted pages. Now I certainly don’t like the idea of having too many of my sites pages in the supplemental index and showing Google more of your content can mean just that. Instead of Google believing you have 100 pages and only 10 of those are in the supplemental index, your site could now have 200 pages with 100 of those in the supplemental index. So Google is now looking at your overall domain and classing that 50% of your site is not in its view ‘quality content’.

What can that do overall to your domain in terms of authority, trust and rankings?. In this way, you can give too much information to the search engines.

Huge sites with masses of inventory will probably find some of the tools that Webmaster Central can offer extremely valuable, but for the majority of sites there are better things you can spend your time doing than worrying about submitting a sitemap.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

4 Comments

2 Days Later

posted by PPC Blog on May 7th, 2008
in Google Adwords  

2 days later

It’s been a couple of days since Googles keyword trademarking policy change and it’s interesting to see many advertisers have already been slapped out of the bidding. In a quality score world, its not as simple as bidding against any brand due to quality based minimum bids. Although you might be able to display against any brand you like for a short period, Google will soon kick you into touch if you are deemed not relevant enough.

Patrick over at Blogstorm posted about the effects of the new trademark policy with screenshots of adverts against once trademarked brands such as Tesco, Asda, Lastminute.com and Amazon. But it was just time before many of them simply fell away…

As I mentioned previously in my post regarding preparation of the Google trademark change, quite simply, it will be extremely hard to be able to display against many core branded terms due to low click through rates which will mean you will get slapped with a high minimum CPC.

Lets take a look at those same brand examples today -

Tesco serp

last minute serp

amazon serp

First and foremost, there has been a massive reduction in adverts as expected. Some of the examples may have been rather bad ‘advanced matching’ from Googles broad match feature otherwise the adverts left within the bidding for the above examples are either -

1) Maintaining a high enough click through rate (and therefore quality score) to keep a reasonable level of minimum CPC. For example, notice how Lastminute.com are having more trouble protecting their brand as many competitors can get away with using ‘Last Minute Holidays’ within the advert title which will be helping to maintain their CTR and advert alive.

2) Advertisers within high CPC markets will find the high minimum CPC’s less of a problem than those in low CPC markets. Advertisers in insurance, loans, mortgages etc markets already pay a high cost per click (£5-£30 max CPC’s), so a high minimum CPC of say even £10 might be lower than their usual average CPC anyway. So for example, Tesco has just a couple of loan related advertisers who can pay that price.

For the above reasons, brands like Amazon will probably have less concerns with competitors. Some of the main areas effected are highly competitive markets with high relevance between brands and product offerings where consumers actively comparison shop for the very best deal. Brands within ‘car insurance’ for example have been hit hard.

These guys pay high CPC’s and have a relevance/comparison shopping nature -

confused serp

go compare serp

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

5 Comments

Google Adds OneBox Results For Premiership Football

posted by PPC Blog on May 2nd, 2008
in Google  

I just spotted Google is showing onebox results for queries relating to English football clubs. A simple club search query brings back their next fixture. Screenshot below -

liverpool onebox result

Only seems to be Premiership clubs currently. Cool.

Update – Google have now added last game results alongside the next fixture. As below -

google onebox result for football

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

2 Comments

Google Keyword Trademark Policy Change – Are You Prepared?

posted by PPC Blog on May 2nd, 2008
in Google Adwords  

Ok so the 5th of May lift on Google keyword trademarking date is nearly here.

Are you prepared? Are your clients?

Are you going all out aggressively to bid against competitors trademarks?.

Are you going to start bidding against your own brand as protection?.

Perhaps a mixture?. Or are you going to wait and see what your competitors do?

Looks like Tesco have taken the ‘moral high ground’ issuing a statement that they will not be bidding against anyone elses branded terms.

Will this moral high ground mean that they get less competition against their own brand?.

Lets see.

The key thing to remember here is ROI. You can go and bid wildy against any brand you like if you are willing to pay through the nose for it, but with a lack of relevance and ultimate conversion its expenditure you can do without.

Lets not forget, Google has quality based minimum bids, so although you may think your brand is relevant, if your click through rate is not high enough your minimum bids will get very high. Trademarks are still in place for adtext and this is a massive factor in click through rates.

Against core branded keywords advertisers will find CTR will not be high enough to allow bidding against brand unless you are willing to pay extortionate CPC’s. This is because core branded keywords contain a high number of navigational queries with lazy searchers who would rather search for the brand than type the url directly into the browser. These searchers can be blind to anything other than the brand they searched for.

I recently set up a competitors adgroup for a client with these types of competitor terms. The competition was directly related selling the same product and all keywords were on phrase match. However, as expected CTR was simply not high enough to keep them active. Unless Google lower CTR thresholds you will see this -

quality based minimum bids

The Hitwise blog highlights the gap in brand traffic lost between the US and UK (where the US have always been able to bid openly against keywords), so there is brand volume to be had from competitors. It just needs to be taken from longer tail queries and more inteligently than simply bidding against core terms.

Another key thing to remember is the relative nature of Googles bidding platform.

If you are bidding against your competitors brand as the only advertiser against the brand owner, then your CTR will be poor in comparison. Google takes into account all advertisers against that keyword. So if you bid in a pack with 8 other advertisers who will also have relatively poor click through rates then the quality threshold might be a lowered a little allowing for lower minimum bids.

So will the threshold naturally decline over time?

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

3 Comments

Amnesty International Promoting Viagra Too

posted by PPC Blog on April 21st, 2008
in SEO  

After Yahoos blog was hacked I spotted today that Amnesty seem to have a similar problem.

Monitoring the SERPs for ‘buy viagra‘ (ahem) I noticed an Amnesty blog post appearing in 8th. If you click on the link you get redirected via some onpage script to a pharmacy site…

amnesty serps

The cached text of the page shows the viagra content. If you go direct to the page (rather than visiting via Google) you won’t be redirected either and can view the text.

What’s most alarming is the scale of the problem over at Amnesty.

A quick site lookup shows blog and news articles full of hidden text and links to .edu domains and ‘pharmacy’ sites… not cool.

Coincidentally the listing above Amnesty for ‘buy viagra’ is from Prospect Magazine. You see as a user you get redirected to the homepage but visit as Googlebot and you see a whole different page. A quick lookup shows they have similar issues to Amnesty.

Looks like Matts 2008 predictions are coming true.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

4 Comments

Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK

posted by PPC Blog on April 4th, 2008
in Google Adwords  

Good news for naughty affiliates. Nightmare for real brands.

Google are moving inline with their policies in the US/Canada.

We’re writing to inform you that we’re changing our trademark complaint procedure in the UK and Ireland. This change may affect how we handle the trademark complaint you currently have on file with Google.

If you’ve submitted a complaint letter requesting that we prevent advertisers from using certain trademark terms anywhere in their ad text, we will continue our efforts to support your request. However, from May 5, 2008, our trademark complaint investigations will no longer result in Google monitoring or restricting keywords for ads served to users in the UK and Ireland. This will bring our procedure in line with the approach taken in the US and Canada. Complaints received on or after today will be processed under our revised procedure.

You do not need to file your trademark complaint with us again unless you would like to amend it based on the new guidelines. For more detailed information regarding our trademark complaint procedure, we invite you to review our revised complaint procedure, posted online at http://www.google.co.uk/tm_complaint.html.

To learn more about this trademark policy revision, please visit http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=92877&hl=en_US.

Sincerely,

Advertising Legal Support Team

More details on the upcoming policy change here.

The new policy will have a big impact on advertisers brand bidding, providing opportunities to bid against competitors brands while of course making it more difficult to protect your own.

Read more about understanding when to bid on your own brand here.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

15 Comments

Yahoo Promoting Viagra

posted by PPC Blog on March 28th, 2008
in Yahoo  

Quite an amusing spot by Jeremy over at PPC Discussions. Looks like the YSMBlog (“nofollow” for you I don’t want to be linking to bad neighbourhoods) has been hacked (another WP exploit example) and currently has a ‘buy viagra’ link hidden in a noscript tag.

Actually what I found interesting is that it took this long for anyone to realise. Check out Archive.org from back in August ’07.

Looks like they were promoting a few things ;)

<div><u style=”display: none”><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=cheap-phentermine” title=”Cheap Phentermine
“>Cheap Phentermine
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-viagra-online” title=”Buy Viagra Online
“>Buy Viagra Online
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-norvasc” title=”Buy Norvasc
“>Buy Norvasc
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-renova” title=”Buy Renova
“>Buy Renova
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-levitra” title=”Buy Levitra
“>Buy Levitra
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=valium” title=”Valium
“>Valium
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-zyprexa” title=”Buy Zyprexa
“>Buy Zyprexa
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=fioricet” title=”Fioricet
“>Fioricet
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-alprazolam” title=”Buy Alprazolam
“>Buy Alprazolam
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=adderall” title=”Adderall
“>Adderall
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-paxil” title=”Buy Paxil
“>Buy Paxil
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=lipitor” title=”Lipitor
“>Lipitor
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-zithromax” title=”Buy Zithromax
“>Buy Zithromax</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-viagra-online” title=”Order Viagra Online
“>Order Viagra Online
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=didrex” title=”Didrex
“>Didrex
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-zovirax” title=”Order Zovirax
“>Order Zovirax
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=buy-prozac” title=”Buy Prozac
“>Buy Prozac
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=butalbital” title=”Butalbital
“>Butalbital
</a><a href=”http://itp.nyu.edu/~ja771/emp/wp-content/themes/redoable/404.php?page=order-cipro” title=”Order Cipro
“>Order Cipro
</a></u></div>

(I cut the number of links in half, it made the post massive!). Timely considering SEL article about the display:none feature of CSS.

email this

Add to deli.cio.us

Digg it

Share on Twitter

3 Comments

Newer Entries »
« Older Entries

Subscribe to the PPC Blog RSS

get the latest news on all things pay per click



follow me on twitter @screamingfrog


Or Subscribe via Email:  

Search

Recent Entries

  • Google Testing New Look SERPs
  • Google Testing Display URLs At The Side Of Organic Results
  • Google Capitalising Keywords In Organic Display URLs
  • Spaces Between Keywords In Adwords Display URLs
  • Adwords Ads Background Back To Yellow?
  • Announcing The Screaming Frog SEO Spider Tool
  • Google Search Query Reports: Beware Other Unique Queries!
  • Google Testing New Ad Format For Comparison Ads
  • Google Testing Different Colour Backgrounds For Adwords Ads
  • Google Geo Targeting Still Poor On The Long Tail

Most Commented

  • Flaunting Affiliate Network Rules With Blackhat PPC (44)
  • Big Geo Problems Still Exist In Google UK SERPS (28)
  • 13 Myths of Pay Per Click (27)
  • Googles Disappearing Blog Post Phenomenon (25)
  • What Next For Bid Management Solutions? (23)
  • Google Still Not Treating Underscores As Word Separators (21)
  • Using Clients To Rank For SEO (20)
  • Should You Allow Closed Group Affiliate Brand Bidding? (17)
  • Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK (15)
  • Understanding When To Bid On Your Own Brand (14)

Categories

  • Pay Per Click (PPC)
  • Affiliate PPC
  • Google
  • Search Engine Marketing
  • Yahoo
  • MSN
  • SEO
  • Microsoft Adcenter
  • Google Adwords
  • Microsoft Live
  • Google Adsense
  • Matt Cutts
  • Yahoo Panama
  • Ask
  • Landing Page Quality
  • Google Quality Score
  • Google Adsbot
  • MiVa
  • Yahoo SSP
  • Pay Per Action

Recent Comments

  • Rob » Google Testing New Look SERPs
  • Alex Buffett » Google Geo Targeting Still Poor On The Long Tail
  • A major Google algorithm update mig… » Google Changing Trademark Policy In The UK
  • Liewilyn » Google Testing New Look SERPs
  • marcus » What Next For Bid Management Solutions?
  • ADAM LAURIE » Should You Allow Closed Group Affiliate Brand Bidd…
  • Whiteboard » Spaces Between Keywords In Adwords Display URLs
  • Mel_rockportshoes » Bing
  • Catherine » Matt Cutts To Be Deleted From Wiki?
  • john » Google Testing New Look SERPs

Monthly Archives

  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010

Links

  • adCenter Blog
  • Adwords Blog
  • Code Buddy
  • Graywolf
  • Greg Boser
  • Jensene
  • Matt Cutts
  • Matt Hopson
  • Screaming Frog
  • Search Engine Land
  • SEO Blog – SEOptimise
  • SEO Home Blog
  • SEroundtable
  • Shoemoney
  • Threadwatch
  • Traffick
  • Yahoo Search Blog
©2006-2012 PPC Blog A Cynical look at Pay Per Click
Designed by Elegant WP Themes
Valid XHTML and Valid CSS