<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Serious Lack Of Transparency In Googles Landing Page Quality Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PPC Blog &#187; The Google Quality Score Paradox</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Blog &#187; The Google Quality Score Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>[...] The importance of Googles quality score has become the single most important factor in maximising performance and profitability of ppc campaigns. The pay per click landscape has become more competitive than ever before and with Yahoos new Panama ad platform moving towards embracing a &#8216;quality&#8217; based algo, understanding the quality score will become more essential than ever for search marketeers and businesses alike. The difficulty in really understanding the Google quality score algo, is the lack of transparency shown by Google, especially with introductions such as the new landing page quality update. So what do we actually know about Quality Score? How can adwords quality score be maximised to increase profitability? Lets look at this from the begining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The importance of Googles quality score has become the single most important factor in maximising performance and profitability of ppc campaigns. The pay per click landscape has become more competitive than ever before and with Yahoos new Panama ad platform moving towards embracing a &#8216;quality&#8217; based algo, understanding the quality score will become more essential than ever for search marketeers and businesses alike. The difficulty in really understanding the Google quality score algo, is the lack of transparency shown by Google, especially with introductions such as the new landing page quality update. So what do we actually know about Quality Score? How can adwords quality score be maximised to increase profitability? Lets look at this from the begining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Answers Questions On Landing Page Quality Update</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Answers Questions On Landing Page Quality Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/a-serious-lack-of-transparency-in-googles-landing-page-quality-update/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>[...] The Inside Adwords Blog has a new post that tries to answer some questions they have received from advertisers regarding their new landing page quality update. The latest update upset a few people for a number of reasons (some valid, some less so&#8230;) but overall there was an overwhelming consensus that there was a serious lack of transparency. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Inside Adwords Blog has a new post that tries to answer some questions they have received from advertisers regarding their new landing page quality update. The latest update upset a few people for a number of reasons (some valid, some less so&#8230;) but overall there was an overwhelming consensus that there was a serious lack of transparency. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
