<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPC Model Testing For Google Site Targeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/cpc-model-testing-for-google-site-targeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/cpc-model-testing-for-google-site-targeting/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/cpc-model-testing-for-google-site-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/ppc/cpc-model-testing-for-google-site-targeting/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>This is good news for me. I&#039;d like to use site-targeting a lot more but dealing with the CPM based pricing just added ads time and complexity to every campaign. PPC pricing like the rest of Adwords would make things simpler and I&#039;d use it a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news for me. I&#8217;d like to use site-targeting a lot more but dealing with the CPM based pricing just added ads time and complexity to every campaign. PPC pricing like the rest of Adwords would make things simpler and I&#8217;d use it a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.ppcblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 03:09:46 -->
