<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Halloween Update Or Bad Data Push?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/</link>
	<description>A cynical look at Pay Per Click (PPC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-91613</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-91613</guid>
		<description>Hi,
My site is new site but i want to come on top 10th places in Google but i am not in the Google i do all the process but i can&#039;t come on it what reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
My site is new site but i want to come on top 10th places in Google but i am not in the Google i do all the process but i can&#8217;t come on it what reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-85406</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-85406</guid>
		<description>It is really unfortunate when you see sites come up high in search rankings when they clearly don&#039;t deserve to be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really unfortunate when you see sites come up high in search rankings when they clearly don&#8217;t deserve to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catalin</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-85339</link>
		<dc:creator>Catalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-85339</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a bad data push, which is unsolved yet (8 days after Matt&#039;s message). I really don&#039;t want to think that this is the new Google algo, as a lot of junk sites comes to top of SERPs. If yes, it means that Google made a big step back in terms of relevance and quality of SERP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a bad data push, which is unsolved yet (8 days after Matt&#8217;s message). I really don&#8217;t want to think that this is the new Google algo, as a lot of junk sites comes to top of SERPs. If yes, it means that Google made a big step back in terms of relevance and quality of SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: india travel</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-84891</link>
		<dc:creator>india travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-84891</guid>
		<description>sites of our competetors also lost their rankings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sites of our competetors also lost their rankings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPCblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-84555</link>
		<dc:creator>PPCblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-84555</guid>
		<description>In private. I don&#039;t want to be to vocal about what verticals I pay a particular attention to :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In private. I don&#8217;t want to be to vocal about what verticals I pay a particular attention to :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-84554</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-84554</guid>
		<description>Will you share what businesses you saw drop out of the serps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you share what businesses you saw drop out of the serps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPCblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-84531</link>
		<dc:creator>PPCblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-84531</guid>
		<description>Update on WMW from Matt Cutts  - &quot;I don&#039;t consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be mostly back to normal and continuing to get back to normal over the course of the day.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on WMW from Matt Cutts  &#8211; &#8220;I don&#8217;t consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be mostly back to normal and continuing to get back to normal over the course of the day.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo Crippa</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/seo/google-halloween-update-or-bad-data-push/comment-page-1/#comment-84380</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo Crippa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/?p=321#comment-84380</guid>
		<description>I noticed this too in the early beginning of yesterday evening, in a while lots of serps totally changed themself.

I read a lot about from different sources, somebody says it is an algorithm test for backlink, other says it was a test for keyword inside domain name, other again says that it is a test only for domain homepages...

But It&#039;s very hard to find the real cause because there were no common things between sites that were &quot;moved&quot;...

Btw I saw that the top placements were taken by early released domains and social media sites... so it could be a test algorithm to promote fresh contents as Google already manage to do with news?

Probably we will never discover what managed that, but the important thing is in this very moment all the datacenter are rolled back to the &quot;original&quot; serps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this too in the early beginning of yesterday evening, in a while lots of serps totally changed themself.</p>
<p>I read a lot about from different sources, somebody says it is an algorithm test for backlink, other says it was a test for keyword inside domain name, other again says that it is a test only for domain homepages&#8230;</p>
<p>But It&#8217;s very hard to find the real cause because there were no common things between sites that were &#8220;moved&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Btw I saw that the top placements were taken by early released domains and social media sites&#8230; so it could be a test algorithm to promote fresh contents as Google already manage to do with news?</p>
<p>Probably we will never discover what managed that, but the important thing is in this very moment all the datacenter are rolled back to the &#8220;original&#8221; serps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.ppcblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 03:01:53 -->
